Therefore, forensic clinicians can be more confident in test scores when the reliability and validity of the examinee’s responses have been evaluated formally as part of the assessment” (p. Burchett and Ben-Porath (2010) found that the validity (as measured by external correlates) of MMPI-2-RF substantive scales was lower among examinees instructed to feign than among examinees who took the test under standard instructions. “One of the reasons for the widespread use of the MMPI instruments in forensic evaluations is their utility in measuring an examinee’s test-taking styles. MMPI-2-RF, WTAT-4, reading level, consistency, forensic assessment Summary of the Research These results suggest that Sentence Comprehension (rather than Word Reading) should be assessed prior to administering psychological testing, especially in forensic settings. However, Word Reading did not significantly account for any additional variance in VRIN-r after accounting for Education and Sentence Comprehension (incremental R2 =. A hierarchical regression predicting VRIN-r scores indicated that WRAT-4 Sentence Comprehension significantly accounted for an additional 5.4% of the variance in VRIN-r scores after accounting for self-reported education level and Word Reading (p =. 07) or TRIN-r (rs = -.10, p =.31), Sentence Comprehension was significantly correlated with VRIN-r (rs = -.27, p =. Although WRAT-4 Word Reading was not significantly correlated with VRIN-r (rs = -.17, p =. It was also hypothesized that there may be a minimal association between Sentence Comprehension and TRIN-r. It was hypothesized that WRAT-4 Sentence Comprehension would demonstrate stronger associations with VRIN-r than WRAT-4 Word Reading. This study examined the association between two measures of WRAT-4 reading ability-Word Reading and Sentence Comprehension-and two well-validated measures of inconsistent responding-MMPI-2-RF Variable Response Inconsistency (VRIN-r) and True Response Inconsistency (TRIN-r) among 136 forensic inpatients (90 men, 46 women). Glassmire, Kent State University Abstract Tarescavage, California State Universityĭavid M.
3, 239-248 Assessing Reading Ability for Psychological Testing in Forensic Assessments: An Investigation with the WRAT-4 AND MMPI-2-RF AuthorsĪnthony M. Below is a summary of the research and findings as well as a translation of this research into practice.įeatured Article | International Journal of Forensic Mental Health | 2017, Vol. This is the bottom line of a recently published article in International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. Assessing sentence comprehension, as opposed to word reading, may reduce the frequency of Invalid MMPI-2-RF Protocols in forensic evaluation.
0 kommentar(er)
